Since Open AI's release of ChatGPT in November 2022, there has been a growing interest in integrating Generative AI into various products. Organizations such as Khan Academy, Notion, and Microsoft Bing have already adopted the technology. However, for enterprise organizations, implementing Generative AI poses unique challenges such as security, compliance, and questioning existing commitments and potentially shifting efforts in a new direction. As a Venture Architect part of an emerging technology team, I've had the opportunity to research these challenges and help a large finance organization understand how they could leverage Generative AI for the next 3-5 years.
Voiceflow and Anthropic’s Claude to help create a conversational workflow that uses a users experience level, role, and industry they work in to provide “coach-like” responses that leverage Claude’s capabilities paired up with a knowledge base.
MyAskAI and Open AI’s GPT4 to create an experience that helps explain specific aspects of Design Thinking that leverages GPT4s interpretation of the content provided and not able to answer if it can’t find the information needed in the content.
Prototypes of current solutions have been developed to better understand the technical levers that can be used to create a Design Thinking experience. These prototypes will be tested with users who have been pre-determined to be interested in the topic.
To learn about my approach, initial learnings and next steps, continue reading below.
To fully comprehend the impact of Generative AI on businesses, I recognized the need to upskill my knowledge. As a visual learner, I prefer learning from industry leaders like Reid Hoffman and YouTube sources like AI Explained, which provide perspectives and opinions on the topic.
I sought insights from interviews with CEOs such as Lex Fridman's interview with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and The Verge's interview with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, where they discuss their organizations' vision and how AI will play a role in their decisions.
Finally, I dove into the technology itself through videos from IBM Technology, Amazon, and various YouTubers to understand how it works and how it can influence product design decisions.
This comprehensive approach has allowed me to develop a deep understanding of Generative AI and its potential impact on businesses.
Upon deepening my understanding of Generative AI through research and education, I sought out real-life examples of its application to gain insights and inspiration.
In particular, I was interested in examining products that went beyond the traditional AI and chatbot experience that people are commonly familiar with and wanted to identify solutions that acted more as coaches than tools.
Through this exploration, I discovered Khan Academy's Khanmigo and Inflection AI's personal AI Pi, both of which help users understand new topics and break down challenges in a personalized and engaging manner.
By closely analyzing these products, I was able to develop a hypothesis for creating similar experiences and gain a deeper understanding of the underlying technology behind Generative AI.
This mental model not only allowed me to appreciate the transformative potential of Generative AI but also provided me with valuable insights that I could apply to my work as a venture architect and product designer.
Providing a foundational generative AI model with unstructured data on Design Thinking, engineering topic specific prompts, and tuning of the system will improve its outputs to create a coach-like experience which will help users learn about the topic and improve their facilitation skills.
Recognizing my technical limitations, I understood that exploring how to train a model was beyond my skill set. Instead, I decided to focus on understanding how to leverage an existing foundational model, which is likely what most businesses will use. This involves identifying the product decisions that create specific experiences based on desired business outcomes, user experience, and technical costs.
To achieve this, I delved into prompt engineering, tuning, and system settings, such as temperature. Additionally, I explored what constitutes as "quality data" in the context of generative AI to understand how each of these factors interact with each other and how they impact the experience. Through this process, I honed my understanding of the technology and developed a list of "How Might We" statements to help me begin prototyping ideas to test.
How might we utilize topic specific data that is unstructured to provide context and improve a foundational model’s ability to answer questions on that topic?
How might we design and engineer prompts to improves outputs while not causing additional overhead that can lead to systems timing out?
–
How might we tweak system settings to provide a “coach like” experience on a specific topic?
–
How might we provide a foundational model user specific context to improve it’s outputs?
–
How might we utilize prompts approaches like few shot, “step by step”, and “tree of thought” to improve outputs?
To begin prototyping some ideas, I searched for existing solutions that would enable me to explore some of my initial hypotheses and how-might-we's. Attempting to avoid building anything from scratch, I found two solutions that, while not perfect, met the requirements needed to prototype a couple of different solutions to test.
Voiceflow and Anthropic’s Claude to help create a conversational workflow that uses a users experience level, role, and industry they work in to provide “coach-like” responses that leverage Claude’s capabilities paired up with a knowledge base.
MyAskAI and Open AI’s GPT4 to create an experience that helps explain specific aspects of Design Thinking that leverages GPT4s interpretation of the content provided and not able to answer if it can’t find the information needed in the content.
Prototypes of current solutions have been developed to better understand the technical levers that can be used to create a Design Thinking experience. These prototypes will be tested with users who have been pre-determined to be interested in the topic.
As more organizations experiment with Generative AI technologies, it's becoming increasingly easier to understand what makes an experience feel personalized and “magical” and a solution that users will love. Some initial takeaways and insights from my initial experiments that will inform next steps:
In addition to empathizing with users, you must also understand how to train, tune, and prompt a foundational model to ensure you’re creating a valuable assistant or complementary feature for a given solution.
–
Identifying the type of data to feed into the model and understanding how that data is being translated is crucial for knowing how to focus a foundational model and deliver a personalized experience.
–
Building an effective user interface that gathers additional context to feed back to the model and displays outputs back to the user in a clear and concise manner is important.
–
Leveraging complementary technologies such as search or relative content as part of the output can make the experience even more engaging and effective.
Through my exploration of existing solutions and my initial prototypes, I have gained valuable insights that I will use to test and iterate my ideas. Experimenting with prompt design and engineering within the context of the current solutions will also be a crucial step in creating a Generative AI experience that is both personalized and engaging.
Testing existing prototypes with real users to understand what is missing, what kind of questions they’re hoping to ask, and how “coach-like” the experience feels.
Solution 1 (Voiceflow)– further experimentation with prompts and conversational workflows to create a more reliable experience.
Solution 2 (MyAskAI)– further training of the model based on user questions asked that it cannot currently answer to provide a more a more expansive dataset.
Exploring and understanding the relationship between engineering and product design in the context of Generative AI.